Copenhagen Accord

Table of contents

Question book-new.svg
This article is a stub. Please help Climate Lab by expanding it. (Replace this text with Month and Year this notice was posted)

Introduction

The Copenhagen Accord is a non-binding agreement that emerged from the UN Copenhagen Climate Conference of December, 2009.   It was negotiated between the United States, China, Brazil, India, and South Africa.  The Accord states that deep international emissions cuts are needed to hold the increase in global temperature to under two degrees Celsius.  Under the Accord, developed countries (Annex I) agree to set targets for reductions in their greenhouse gas emissions by 2020.  Developing countries agree to pursue nationally appropriate mitigation strategies to slow the growth of their emissions, but are not committed to reducing their carbon output.1

Signatories of the Accord

To date, more than 120 countries, including the 27-member European Union, have agreed to the Copenhagen Accord. For a complete, up-to-date overview, visit Who's On Board With the Copenhagen Accord page on the US Climate Action Network's Web site.

Country Proposed Reduction by 2020 Reduction from Projected 2020 Emissions due to Mitigation Actions Reduction of Carbon Intensity (Carbon Dioxide Emissions Per Unit of GDO)
Afghanistan      
Albania      
Algeria      
Armenia      
Australia  5-25% from 2000 levels    
Austria see EU    
Bahamas       
Bangladesh       
Belarus 5-10% from 1990 levels    
Belgium see EU    
Benin      
Bhutan      
Bosnia and Herzegovina      
Botswana      
Brazil   36.1-38.9% reduction from proposed 2020 emissions  
Bulgaria see EU    
Burkina Faso      
Cambodia      
Canada 17% from 2005 levels    
Central African Republic      
Chad      
Chile      
China     40-45%
Colombia      
Congo      
Costa Rica       
Cote d'Ivoire      
Croatia 5% from 1990 levels    
Cyprus see EU    
Czech Republic see EU    
Democratic Republic of Congo      
Denmark see EU    
Djibouti      
Eritrea      
Estonia see EU    
Ethiopia      
European Union 20-30% from 1990 levels    
Fiji       
Finland see EU    
France see EU    
Gabon      
Gambia      
Georgia      
Germany see EU    
Ghana      
Greece see EU    
Guatemala      
Guinea      
Guyana      
Hungary see EU    
Iceland 30% from 1990 levels    
India     20-25%
Indonesia   26% reduction from projected 2020 levels  
Ireland see EU    
Israel   20% reduction from projected 2020 levels  
Italy see EU    
Jamaica      
Japan 25% from 1990 levels    
Jordan      
Kazakhstan 15% from 1992 levels    
Kiribati       
Lao People's Democratic Republic      
Latvia see EU    
Lesotho      
Liechtenstein 20-30% from 1990 levels    
Lithuania see EU    
Luxemburg see EU    
Macedonia      
Madagascar      
Malawi      
Maldives  100% from 2009 levels    
Mali      
Malta see EU    
Marshall Islands 40% from 2009 levels    
Mauritania      
Mexico   30% reduction from projected 2020 levels  
Monaco 30% from 1990 levels    
Mongolia      
Montenegro      
Morocco      
Mozambique      
Namibia      
Nepal      
Netherlands see EU    
New Zealand 10-20% from 1990 levels    
Norway 30-40% from 1990 levels    
Palau      
Panama      
Papua New Guinea      
Peru      
Poland see EU    
Portugal see EU    
Republic of Korea   30% reduction from projected 2020 levels  
Republic of Moldova 25% from 1990 levels    
Romania see EU    
Russian Federation 15-25% from 1990 levels    
Rwanda      
Samoa      
San Marino      
Senegal      
Serbia      
Sierra Leone      
Singapore   7-11% reduction from projected 2020 levels  
Slovakia see EU    
Slovenia see EU    
South Africa   34% reduction from projected 2020 levels  
Spain see EU    
Sweden see EU    
Swaziland      
Switzerland 20-30% reduction from 1990 levels    
Tonga      
Trinidad and Tobago      
Tunisia      
United Arab Emirates      
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland  see EU    
United Republic of Tanzania      
United States of America 17% reduction from 2005 levels    
Uruguay      
Vietnam      
Zambia      

2 3

Criticisms

The Copenhagen Accord has been widely criticized as an inadequate and half-hearted measure to combat change. In an opinion article published in Nature on 22nd April, 2010 titled "Copenhagen Accord Pledges are Paltry," the authors argue that current pledges imply an above 50% chance that global temperature will rise by 3°C by the end of this century.4

Footnotes

1. "Copenhagen Accord" Conference of the Parties 15 Session. Copenhagen December 7-18, 2009.

2. "Appendix I of the Copenhagen Accord" United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved April 16, 2010.

3. "Appendix II of the Copenhagen Accord" United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved April 16, 2010

4.  Joeri Rogelj, Julia Nabel, Claudine Chen, William Hare, Kathleen Markmann, Malte Meinshausen et al, "Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry," Nature 464, 1126-1128 (22 April 2010) | doi:10.1038/4641126a; Published online 21 April 2010http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v464/n7292/full/4641126a.html

Tags
You must login to post a comment.